AUDREY ADAMS, BOARD MEMBER
Washington Action for Safe Water

June 5, 2012

Everett City Council

2930 Wetmore Ave

Everett, WA 98201

 

RE: Fluoridation

 

Dear Everett City Council members,

 

Thank you sincerely for listening to all sides of the debate regarding water fluoridation. Your open-mindedness is refreshing and encouraging.

 

When I testified at the March 21 meeting, I said I was speaking to protect the health of your children and grandchildren, not mine, since I live in Renton. I stand corrected. My daughter and her husband have just bought a house in unincorporated Bothell, which we’ve discovered receives Everett’s water.

 

Myself, my daughter and my autistic son all have physical reactions to the chemicals in fluoridated water. My husband is spared. My son is by far the most affected, suffering headaches, migraines and other pain after drinking or bathing in water treated with fluoridation chemicals. My son’s pain from one fluoridated shower can onset within minutes and last many hours.

 

My son does not experience this type or level of pain from non-fluoridated water, even if it contains chlorine. We have confirmed this countless times when staying overnight in many dozens of different unfluoridated areas, where he can shower without pain and without red eyes, another side effect.

 

My daughter often provides care for her autistic brother in her home. He suffers medically confirmed multiple chemical sensitivities and, specifically, severe reactivity to fluoridated water. He requires expensive specialized water filtration because fluoride is not removed by common household filters.

 

Water utilities and public health authorities do not make any accommodations for people who cannot tolerate the fluoridation drugs added to public water. There isn’t a drug on earth that is 100% safe, effective and advisable for 100% of the population.

 

The fluoridation chemicals Everett uses meets the federal and state definitions of both a drug and a poison. The Washington State Board of Health has confirmed that it regards fluoride added to water as a drug. This means that hyper-sensitive people like my son are forced to take a poisonous drug that medically and physically harms them, or pay the exorbitant cost to avoid it.

 

Using water free of fluoride is not a choice for my son, it’s a necessity. Access to drinkable water is a basic human right. Could this right fall under the protection of the ADA? Who should pay for specialized water filtration for people who require water free of fluoridation chemicals for all uses and locations?

 

Everett or the Dept of Health could reimburse them, but hyper-sensitive people also need fluoride-free water in the community, such as restaurants, parks and schools. Water is my son’s only beverage so he must always take safe water with him everywhere he goes. This is an enormous burden.

 

Many haven’t yet discovered that their reactions, or their children’s reactions, are caused by the fluoridation chemicals in the water. It has taken me almost two decades to fully understand the scope of the pain my autistic son was suffering because of fluoridated water. It was during this long journey that I discovered my own entirely different minor but annoying side effect, itchy rashes.

 

Who is ensuring that fluoride drug “treatment” is medically appropriate for every consumer “patient”?

Who is monitoring the medical needs and health consequences to people like my son when you medically treat people through water? Nobody—no doctor, no dentist, no public health agency.

 

What public health measures are taken by the City of Everett or the Snohomish County Health District to protect hyper-sensitive people? What public health actions have been taken specifically to protect infants and young children whose hyper-sensitivity could not yet have been diagnosed and who would be harmed the most? Absolutely none.

 

Drugs, intended to treat any portion of the population, don’t belong in the water. Fluoride is a drug, a medical treatment, and should not be forced on anyone. Medical treatments, which always affect different people differently, should never be decided by a vote–not by the people, not by a board and not by a city council. Drugs and medical treatments must be between the patient and the doctor or dentist of their choosing because they must be tailored to the needs of the individual patient.

 

Thank you for listening. Thank you more for questioning. Thank you most for thinking.

Sincerely,

Audrey Adams
10939 SE 183rd Ct, Renton, WA 98055
audrey55@comcast.net