Print Friendly

This post is archived for global access at: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/a967517c3ccfbada

**DANGER**: “FLUORIDATION” LEAD POISONING HAZARDS (ATTN HUD LEAD HAZARD CONTROL)

ATTENTION Ninth Circuit Chief Judge ALEX KOZINSKI (via Web_CA09Admin@ca9.uscourts.gov):

ALEX: Please end EPA’s obvious ongoing LEAD POISONING child abuse crime immediately in your jurisdiction.

EPA’s own Maximum Contaminant Level Goal for lead is zero!  See below.

Please also end the other obvious child abuse crimes I’ve pointed out to you – like OBGYNs and midwives closing birth canals up to 30% (most births) and KEEPING birth canals closed up to 30% when babies get stuck and hands/forceps/vacuums are used to pull (1 in 10 births).

Some babies are DYING and OBGYNs are LYING to cover-up – even as they indirectly admit on video that they KNOW they are routinely closing birth canals up to 30% – with the video already exempted from the hearsay rule!

See below

First this discussion of EPA’s obvious ongoing lead poisoning child abuse crime…

 

OPEN LETTER archived for global access; see below.

 

Jon L. Gant

Director

Office Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control US Dept. of Housing and Urban Development

(202) 708-0310 x 7025

451 7th Street S.W., Washington, DC 20410 Via Jon.L.Gant@hud.gov

 

Jon,

 

DANGER

 

EPA MAKES NO MENTION OF LEAD FROM “FLUORIDATION” (TWO SOURCES)

 

1. EPA makes no mention of the fact that “fluoridation” is the practice of forcing children to drink extremely dilute hazardous waste with arsenic and lead. See THE ‘fluoridation’ lie (the HHS/CDC/EPA version)…

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/f4e80e68bb8139c3

 

2. EPA makes no mention of the fact that “fluoridation” hazardous wastes (silicofluorides) add MORE lead to the water by leaching lead from plumbing fixtures.

 

EPA **does** mention that lead is leached from plumbing fixtures (even in new homes), as in,

 

“…lead can enter drinking water from plumbing materials. Lead may cause a range of health effects, from behavioral problems and learning disabilities, to seizures and death. Children six years old and under are most at risk…new homes are also at risk: even legally ‘lead-free’ plumbing may contain up to 8 percent lead. The most common problem is with brass or chrome-plated brass faucets and fixtures which can leach significant amounts of lead into the water, especially hot water.”

http://www.epa.gov/lead/

 

BUT (I SAY AGAIN): EPA MAKES NO MENTION OF “FLUORIDATION” LEACHING OF LEAD…

 

THE KICKER (noted above for Judge Kozinski): EPA’s Maximum Contaminant Level Goal for both arsenic and lead is ZERO.

http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/

 

WHY IS EPA IGNORING THIS SOURCE OF LEAD – EVEN *LYING* ABOUT IT?

 

See again: THE ‘fluoridation’ lie (the HHS/CDC/EPA version)…

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/f4e80e68bb8139c3

 

“ALWAYS”…

 

Drinking extremely dilute hazardous waste “is ALWAYS significantly associated with increased blood lead levels in children,” according to Dartmouth University’s Roger Masters, PhD as quoted by Fluoride Action Network/FAN. [ALWAYS emphasis in FAN's original.] http://www.fluoridealert.org/sf-masters.htm

 

Jon, please speak out publicly from HUD to urge EPA to simply stop the widespread municipal practice of forcing children to drink extremely dilute hazardous waste with arsenic and lead.

 

Thanks.

 

Sincerely,

 

Todd

 

Dr. Gastaldo

Hillsboro, Oregon

USA

todd@chiromotion.com

 

PS I see you gave an award to TAMARA RUBIN, executive director of Lead Safe America Foundation, as in,

 

“Tamara Rubin, a Sellwood resident, shown with Jon Gant, Director of the HUD Office Of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control, as she received her award [for her 'volunteer advocacy work around the country helping families whose children have been poisoned by lead paint in their homes']…On March 31 of this year [2011], Tamara incorporated a new nonprofit organization, the ‘Lead Safe America Foundation’, with the State of Oregon, to provide emergency support to families with lead poisoned children.

http://www.thebeenews.com/features/story.php?story_id=130967169972573800

 

Copied to:

 

Tamara Rubin

Executive Director

Lead Safe America Foundation

P.O. Box 820044

Portland, Oregon 97282

Via leadsafe@mac.com

 

TAMARA, thanks for educating the public “to prevent childhood lead poisoning in the first place.”

http://www.leadsafeamerica.org/leadsafeamerica.org/Home.html

 

You write: “Lead can be found in water sources but this is primarily because it is being leached into the water from another source.  The ‘other’ source could be a hazardous waste dump…”

http://www.mychildrenhaveleadpoisoning.com/My_Children_Have_Lead_Poisoning/Source_Water.html

 

You engage in gross understatement: Most of the time the “other” source *IS* a hazardous waste dump. (Pollution scrubbers in the phosphate fertilizer industry are the source of “fluoridation” chemicals for most municipalities. EPA fails to mention this fact. See again: THE “fluoridation” lie (the HHS/CDC/EPA version).

 

If you still live in Portland, Oregon, you are likely aware that Portland is the largest city in America that does not force children to drink extremely dilute hazardous waste with arsenic and lead.

 

On Sept. 27, 2011, The Oregonian reported that proponents of the practice are hoping to start “fluoridation” in Portland…

 

“Fluoride proponents visit Commissioner Randy Leonard…who is in charge of the Portland Water Bureau.”

http://blog.oregonlive.com/portlandcityhall/2011/09/fluoride_proponents_visit_comm.html

 

Whatever happens in Portland, please join me in urging EPA to simply stop the widespread municipal practice of forcing children to drink extremely dilute hazardous waste with arsenic and lead.

 

BACK TO HUD…

 

HUD FOCUSES ON LEAD POISONING FROM PAINT (BRAVO!).

 

AND HUD IS ALSO INTERESTED IN ARSENIC POISONING (BRAVO!).

 

See American Healthy Homes Survey

Lead and Arsenic Findings

April 2011

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development/HUD Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control –This work was conducted under Contract No. C-PHI-00882, Task Order 1, with QuanTech, Inc. The report was written by David C. Cox, Gary Dewalt, Robert O’Haver and Brendon Salatino. Significant contributions to this project and/or the document were made by Peter J. Ashley, DrPH; Warren Friedman, Ph.D., CIH; and Eugene A. Pinzer, MS, Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control. Peer reviewers included: David E. Jacobs, PhD, CIH, National Center for Healthy Housing; Mary Jean Brown, ScD, RN, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and David Marker, PhD, Senior Statistician, Westat.

http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=AHHS_REPORT.pdf

 

BUT HUD MAKES NO MENTION OF LEAD OR ARSENIC FROM “FLUORIDATION” – AT LEAST I COULD NOT FIND ANY SUCH MENTION…

 

AGAIN: EPA’S MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL GOAL FOR BOTH ARSENIC AND LEAD IS **ZERO**..

 

**WHY** IS EPA ALLOWING MUNICIPALITIES TO **ADD** ARSENIC AND LEAD (HAZARDOUS WASTE) TO DRINKING WATER?

 

EPA is LYING as noted above.

 

And EPA has been getting help from the judiciary: US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Robert Bork were both nominated for the US Supreme Court after they helped EPA crookedly keep the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level Goal for fluoride at 4 ppm.

 

See again: THE ‘fluoridation’ lie (the HHS/CDC/EPA version)…

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/f4e80e68bb8139c3

 

And there is the QUILES faucet fraud (discussed at the just cited URL) wherein the Florida Supreme Court rubberstamped a lower court’s decision in QUILES that “fluoridation” is not forced medication – it’s not even MEDICATION (said the lower court) – because Florida cities intend the stuff for FAUCETS – not bloodstreams.

 

QUILES is OBVIOUS faucet fraud: Faucets don’t need the hazardous waste and Florida cities DO intend the stuff for bloodstreams.

 

Again, see THE ‘fluoridation’ lie (the HHS/CDC/EPA version)…

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/f4e80e68bb8139c3

 

Copied to:

 

Mary McBride

HUD Regional Administrator (Region 10: Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington state) Seattle Federal Office Building

909 First Avenue, Suite 200

Seattle, WA 98104-1000

Phone: (206) 220-5101

Toll-free: (877) 741-3281

Via WA_Webmanager@hud.gov;Donna.Batch@hud.gov;bill.fattic@hud.gov;doug_carlson@hud.gov

 

MARY: Orion Lumiere of Oregon Opportunity Network gave your job description:

 

“McBride will serve as HUD’s liaison to mayors, city managers, elected representatives, state and local officials, congressional delegations, stakeholders and customers. She will be responsible for overseeing the delivery of HUD programs and services to communities, as well as evaluating their efficiency and effectiveness.”

–From an interview by Orion Lumiere of Oregon Opportunity Network

http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/states/alaska/stories/2010-05-06

 

Please urge all “mayors, city managers, elected representatives, state and local officials, congressional delegations, stakeholders and customers” to end the practice of forcing children to drink extremely dilute hazardous waste with arsenic and lead.

 

You were quoted: “EPA mostly responds to situations as they occur.”

 

When the state of South Carolina sued EPA because it thought EPA had set the Maximum Contaminant Level Goal for fluoride too low, EPA simply raised the MCLG to 4 ppm – NO SCIENCE NECESSARY! – and two US Supreme Court Nominees went along with the gag and helped make EPA’s 4 ppm fluoride goal stick – over the protests of a huge EPA union.  See above.

 

“TEETH GROSS ENOUGH TO GAG A MAGGOT”

 

Fluoride Action Network has this 1985 quote from an EPA drinking water analyst:

 

“Up to now EPA, under the Safe Drinking Water Act, has regulated fluoride in order to prevent children from having teeth which looked like they had been chewing brown shoe polish and rocks… EPA in response to new studies, which only confirmed the old studies, and some flat out political preasure, has decided to raise the standard to 4 mg/L. This increase will allow 40% of all children to have teeth gross enough to gag a maggot.”

– Paul Price, EPA Drinking Water Analyst, October 31, 1985.

http://www.fluoridealert.org/dental-fluorosis.htm

 

“Gross enough to gag a maggot” depends on the maggot I guess; but check out the PHOTOS…

 

Fluoride Action Network cites a 2005 study from CDC:

 

“According to the Centers for Disease Control, 32% of American children now have some form of dental fluorosis, with 2 to 4% of children having the moderate to severe stages (CDC 2005).”

http://www.fluoridealert.org/dental-fluorosis.htm

 

CHECK OUT THE “WHITE SPOTS” PHOTOS OF EARLY TOOTH DECAY…

 

They look an awful lot like dental fluorosis white spots!

 

See Enhancing the Integration of Dental Health and Maternal Health and Child Health…<–PHOTOS –Presented by Kim Herremans, RDH, MS http://www.fachc.org/doc/MaternalChildDentalHealthHerremans.pdf

 

Copied to:

 

Kim Herremans, RDH, MS

Dental Health Consultant

Hillsborough County Health Department

813-373-8665

Via Kim_Herremans@doh.state.fl.us

 

KIM,

 

WHAT RIGHT DOES EPA HAVE TO IGNORE ITS OWN **ZERO** MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL GOAL FOR ARSENIC AND LEAD – AND CONTINUE ITS OBVIOUSLY CROOKED (SEE ABOvE) 4 PPM MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL GOAL FOR FLUORIDE?

 

THINK ABOUT IT: 2 TO 4% OF CHILDREN HAVE MODERATE TO SEVERE DENTAL FLUOROSIS – WITH SOME SUFFERING FRACTURES OF THEIR TEETH!

 

IT’S INSANE!

 

Copied to:

 

Orion Lumiere

Development and Communications Manager

Oregon Opportunity Network

503-335-2826

847 NE 19th Avenue

Suite 150

Portland, OR 97232

Via Orion@OregonON.org

 

ORION: Thanks for your interview with HUD’s Mary McBride.

 

And thanks for reading everyone.

 

Sincerely,

 

Todd

 

Dr. Gastaldo

 

Hillsboro, Oregon

USA

todd@chiromotion.com

 

ONE LAST NOTE (SINCE SOME PEOPLE ARE STILL READING. : )

 

A Washington State attorney – James Robert Deal – wants to stop ALL lead leaching – not just that caused by “fluoridation.”

 

He writes:

 

“The first and most important step is to stop fluoridation, especially with silicofluoride.”

 

I AGREE.

 

—–Original Message—–

From: Henry Morgan

Sent: Oct 29, 2011 8:12 PM

To: FLUORIDE DISC LIST

Subject: [FLUORIDE] FW: lead leaching by chlorine

 

 

 

 

——————————————————————————–

From: James Robert Deal [mailto:JamesRobertDeal@jamesdeal.com]

Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 12:24 PM

To: fluoride-class-action@yahoogroups.com; wa_action_for_safe_water@yahoogroups.com; FluoridePoisoning@yahoogroups.com

Subject: lead leaching by chlorine

 

 

 

10-29-11

 

 

Friends,

 

 

Even after water districts stop fluoridation, there will still be between 8% and 30% lead in pipes and fittings. It’s close to zero but only in newer homes in California.

 

 

If fluoridation stops, how much lead leaching will still occur?

 

 

If we added no fluoride, how much lead would chlorine or chloramines leach?

 

 

How do we stop lead leaching? Do we remove all the pipe containing lead, as the Seattle School district is gradually doing?

 

 

To remove all the lead bearing pipes in old houses, old apartment buildings, old commercial buildings – would cost billions of dollars.

 

 

Is there a way to leave the lead in place and seal it in?

 

 

If water is hard, and you run calcium carbonate through the lines, the carbonate bonds with the lead and walls it off. Will that wall prevent chlorine from leaching lead?

 

 

The first and most important step is to stop fluoridation, especially with silicofluoride. How badly does sodium fluoride leach lead?

 

 

Lead leaches out more in soft acidic water, like we have here in Seattle. Our water is very low in calcium and other minerals.

 

 

So what is the best alkalizer to raise the pH? How does the alkalizer interact with the chlorine or chloramines?

 

 

Is the amount of lead that chlorine will leach de minimis?

 

 

What would be the cost of killing the bacteria closer to the place of use, in the neighborhoods, with ozonation? Instead of running chlorine throughout the entire line, just ozonate in neighborhoods. What is the cost differential? How much cancer is caused by inhaling chlorine in shower water or in drinking chlorine?

 

 

I think our work is gaining more traction because we are focusing on the lead and arsenic as well as the fluoride, and we are explain that silicofluoride is even worse than sodium fluoride.

 

 

These city council members are programmed, and the best way to deprogram them is to explain the entire picture to them.

 

 

If we offer a comprehensive solution to water quality, one that minimizes exposure to lead as well as fluoride, I think they will more likely find their way out of the maze.

 

 

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090906112824AAWGrcF

 

 

http://www.chemguide.co.uk/inorganic/group4/chlorides.html

 

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead%28II%29_chloride

 

 

http://www.lenntech.com/periodic/water/lead/lead-and-water.htm

 

 

http://books.google.com/books?id=3xfjyTqqR7IC&pg=PA460&lpg=PA460&dq=romans+lead+pipes+calcium+carbonate+hard+water&source=bl&ots=sL_SEZMiBj&sig=PqBL6THMRLW9EE0YjfYuwE5Bztg&hl=en&ei=ISSsTt7yAqTeiAKN6J3_Cg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=romans%20lead%20pipes%20calcium%20carbonate%20hard%20water&f=false

 

 

This is a good one:

 

 

http://vimeo.com/29647460

 

 

 

Sincerely,

 

 

James Robert Deal , Attorney

James@JamesRobertDeal.com

 

PO Box 2276 Lynnwood WA 98036

 

Telephone: 425-771-1110

 

>>>>END Attorney Deal’s message…

 

ON A PERSONAL NOTE…

 

(Don’t miss the part below about OBGYNs and midwives closing birth canals up to 30% – most births – and KEEPING birth canals closed up to 30% when babies get stuck and hands/forceps/vacuums are used to pull (1 in 10 births.)

 

Three successive US Attorneys for the District of Oregon ignored obvious crimes I reported to them.

 

Two federal judges (Hubel and Brown) went along with the gag.

 

So I appealed my case (United States of America v. Gastaldo, Case No. 10-35385).

 

Three MORE federal judges affirmed.

 

Ninth Circuit judges Silverman, Fletcher and Murguia said blithely that my argumentation is “unpersuasive” and they offered NO support – substantive or otherwise – for their “unpersuasive” criticism – this after I paid my $455 and waited a year for their decision.

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2011/10/12/10-35385.pdf

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/memoranda/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000009283

 

Fraud in the inducement of chiropractic student loans is a crime.

 

The government fraudulently induced potential chiropractic students to take out loans (and potential chiropractic patients to go to chiropractors) by mandating radiation (x-rays) of grandmothers (a crime on its face) to demonstrate vertebral subluxations knowing that chiropractors had admitted they could not demonstrate vetebral subluxations on x-ray.

 

I pointed out the OBVIOUS ongoing Medicare billing fraud – and the government did nothing – and five federal judges went along with the gag!

 

I pointed out that the government is in the HABIT of ignoring obvious crime.

 

As I noted in my case…

 

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/6933bf4af6c7e0e4

 

>>According to Rule 406 of the Federal Rules of Evidence: “Evidence of the habit

>of a person or of the routine practice of an organization, whether corroborated

>or not and regardless of the presence of eyewitnesses, is relevant to prove that

>the conduct of the person or organization on a particular occasion was in

>conformity with the habit or routine practice.”

 

>>Just as Plaintiff United States of America’s Medicare program is still

>fraudulently paying for correction of vertebral subluxations “demonstrated to

>exist” knowing that chiropractic physicians can’t demonstrate correctable

>vertebral subluxations – Plaintiff United States of America’s Medicare program

>is paying billions per year to hospitals – $100,000 per year per recently

>graduated medical student/resident – to train medical students to close birth

>canals up to 30% and keep birth canals closed when babies get stuck and

>forceps/vacuums are used to pull.

answer!

 

IN ACCORD WITH RULE 406 (JUST QUOTED), I DESCRIBED THE BIRTH-CANAL-CLOSING/SPINAL MANIPULATION CRIME TO THE COURT…

 

I similarly described the birth-canal-closing crime to Anthony Rosner, PhD, a prominent supporter of chiropractors…

 

>>>>BEGIN excerpt of Birth crime: Dr. Rosner replied

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/5607ffe22608c9d6

 

See also: Birth crime and Ron Rupert, DC (father of Joe?)

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/28b6e5bdd14868aa

 

BIRTH CRIME: DR. ROSNER REPLIED…

 

MY RESPONSES ARE INTERSPERSED ####

 

Hello Todd,

 

Yes, I am the Anthony Rosner from years ago. I could not agree more

about the manhandling that can happen and has been reported in

childhood delivery.

 

#### I have never heard it called “manhandling.” I would not call it

that without qualification. Whatever you call it, please speak out.

 

#### In most births, there is birth-canal-closing/PUSHING spinal

manipulation/”manhandling” (most women are semisitting or dorsal as

their uteri are chemically whipped with pitocin).

 

#### In 1 in 10 births there is – in addition – birth-canal-closing

PULLING spinal manipulation/”manhandling” (women are KEPT semisitting

or dorsal as the OBGYN or midwife pulls with hands/forceps/vacuums).

 

#### Sometimes the spinal manipulation/”manhandling” is paralyzing –

sometimes OBGYNs pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny

spinal cords.

 

#### Sometimes it’s fatal – and OBGYNs are lying to cover-up even as

they indirectly admit on video that they KNOW they are closing birth

canals up to 30%.

 

#### For the Four OB Lies (they are whoppers)…

 

See again: Dents in babies’ skulls

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/08abfc7ff242150e

 

#### THE KICKER: The relevant video – the American College of

Obstetricians and Gynecologists/ACOG’s Shoulder Dystocia training

video – has already been ruled exempt from the hearsay rule – and the

version of McRoberts maneuver purported on the video to offer maximal

pelvic outlet area actually keeps the birth canal closed with more

force.

 

>>>>END excerpt of Birth crime: Dr. Rosner replied

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/5607ffe22608c9d6

 

See also: Birth crime and Ron Rupert, DC (father of Joe?)

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/28b6e5bdd14868aa

 

READERS – what do you think…

 

Regardless whether I am forced to pay back my chiropractic student loan again…

 

Should the government end the sometimes-fatal rampant BIRTH-CANAL-CLOSING/spinal manipulation crime I reported in court documents accord with Rule 406?

 

Should federal judges ORDER the government to stop the obvious mass child abuse crime I reported?

 

I think the answer is obvious – regardless what the court decides in regard to my chiropractic student loan – which I swear – I already paid – albeit in a creative manner as I noted for the originating court.

 

I SAY AGAIN:

 

Ninth Circuit judges Silverman, Fletcher and Murguia said blithely that my argumentation is “unpersuasive” and they offered NO support – substantive or otherwise – for their “unpersuasive” criticism – this after I paid my $455 and waited a year for their decision.

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2011/10/12/10-35385.pdf

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/memoranda/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000009283

 

It’s libel by omission – by some powerful people – federal judges…

 

My detractors can now point to the Ninth Circuit decision and truthfully say that three federal judges found that my argumentation is “unpersuasive.”

 

THINK ABOUT IT: Ninth Circuit judges Silverman, Fletcher and Murguia engaged in raw judicial power – babies be damned – not at all unlike the mass child abuse-perpetuating behavior of US Supreme Court nominees Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Robert Bork in the “teeth gross enough to gag a maggot” matter discussed above.

 

And then there is the ongoing QUILES faucet fraud discussed above.

 

The judiciary is crooked – children be damned.

 

I’ll cc Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski again via Web_CA09Admin@ca9.uscourts.gov.

 

ALEX: Please immediately order the government to stop the obvious ongoing child abuse crimes in your jurisdiction.

 

Thanks.

 

Your friend,

 

Todd