| John Percival DDS MSc. DiHom. jpercival@fairpoint.net 66.243.193.184 |
Dear Mr. Deal, I am an epidemiologist, semi-retired dentist and homeopathic physican who has been engaged in the bellum fluoricum for many years, having done research, published, and spoken publicly about this megatoxin. I came across your website through an email from Cathy Justus, who lives in Pagosa Springs, CO, about 2 hours away. (The lady whose horses were poisoned by her town’s fluoridated water). We have spoken on the phone. I’m tired of trying to convince my closed-minded dental peers of the morbific effects of fluoride through sound science, and so it thus seems that the litigious route is the only one remaining to garner their full attention and effect true changes in water fluoridation protocol by holding the purveyors of fluoridation at all levels of involvement, liable. Thank you for your recommendations on establishing a modus operandi for lay people and professionals for holding municipalities legally liable. Although my small town does not fluoridate, neighboring ones do. Bit by bit we need to etch away (much as fluoride does chemically) at the “industry’s” stronghold. I was sorry to read of the Washington Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in support of fluoridation, because of the public’s supposed and mandated non-involvement in administrative affairs. Although not a litigious person by nature, I sincerely hope that more tort suits are brought by Thank you for your continuing efforts in this battle and look forward to hearing from you at some point. Sincerely, Dr. John Percival |
Thank you Peter for your insightful and accurate description of our situation at hand. Aside from fluoride’s non-efficacy in protecting against caries, and its morbific effects upon numerous body systems, the thought of mass medication is unconscionable, unethical and illegal in my humble opinion. If it takes demonstrations in the streets to stop this pro-fluoridation regime, then so be it.
John
The game is nearly up! Just as in Australia, Southern Island & England we too in New Zealand were conned into the fluoride deception. I have read so much about the history of fluoride and fluoridation, watched video’s, documentaries, looked at the other side of the argument, argued with Government officials now that I think my brain is near bursting with information overload!
When I read all the debacles going on over fluoride and fluoridation, all the massive amount of scientific data going backwards and forwards, the debates in council chambers and so on and so on I think to myself that if the perpetrators of this deception were still alive would laugh themselves silly over the amount of controversy they have caused through their simple deception and how successful Edward Bernays was at convincing Doctors and Dentists on the wonders of fluoridation.
I am truly amazed at how gullible we have been on this simple issue!
The Aluminum Corporation of America wanted to get rid of a very nasty poisonous substance. Not allowed to release it into the atmosphere, rivers, lakes, streams or the sea. Then bingo up came someone with this idea that was so crazy so stupid so dangerous that the public were bound to swallow it (literally). Put it in the public water supply and make them pay for it as well! For the corporates a very clever addition to their already opulent lifestyle.
The right amount of fluoride, no more no less is the correct amount for a human being is as follows. Mothers breast milk 0.004 ppm for the baby which is so infinitesimal that it is totally excreted by the baby.
That is the exact amount of fluoride we need as human beings.
Meanwhile The Aluminum and fertiliser corporations are still laughing themselves silly over the stupidity of mankind over this issue!
It will be stopped but the damage done already is astronomical. This will be seen as the biggest crime of last century.